Tttttt EA

newdigital:
tttttt EA,

H1 timeframe.

4 main pairs.

It is interesting EA.

EA determines HH and LL for the current day, determine average range H-L for the last 7 days (days2check), open buy order at HH+avgrange/2 or sell order at LL-avgrange/2 (offsetK=2) and profit is avgrange/2 (profitK=2), stop is avgrange/2 (lossK=2).

People still wonder why this EA is profitable (during the backtesting) and trying to find some mistake in the code.

But seems nobody did forward test.

newdigital:
tttttt EA,

H1 timeframe.

4 main pairs.

It is interesting EA.

EA determines HH and LL for the current day, determine average range H-L for the last 7 days (days2check), open buy order at HH+avgrange/2 or sell order at LL-avgrange/2 (offsetK=2) and profit is avgrange/2 (profitK=2), stop is avgrange/2 (lossK=2).

People still wonder why this EA is profitable (during the backtesting) and trying to find some mistake in the code.

But seems nobody did forward test.

newdigital:
Please find:

- detailed statements by pairs from the beginning of the testing (all__12feb_alpari.zip);

- detailed statements by pairs from the beginning of the testing for the all the orders opened from 8 till 18 alpari server time (all__12feb_8_18time_alpari.zip);

And just to compare the results of the forward testing by pairs with timefilter and without timefilter (all the data is from the beginning of the testing according to the statements attached):

- EURUSD ......................... -145

- EURUSD with timefilter...... 12

- GBPUSD ......................... -182

- GBPUSD with timefilter....... -9

- USDJPY ......................... 169

- USDJPY with timefilter....... 45

- USDCHF ......................... -153

- USDCHF with timefilter....... 23

So the conclusion is the following:

This EA is more profitable with timefilter for the 3 main pairs except USDJPY.

newdigital:
Updated statements for this EA with/without timefilter.