Correlations revisited ... - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It occurred to me that it should be posted here (due to its nature)This is a Spearman rank (auto)correlation that uses floating levels
it needs spearman.dlll and?
yes, it needs spearman.dll (and nothing else)
i dont' know why but none of my spearman indicators work but I have both spearman.dll and dynamicZone.dll in libraries folder
I don't know
If they are set as usual (dll import enabled) and if other indicators using other dlls (like dynamic zone indicators) are working, then the spearman has to work too (tested it using build 840 :
and build 988 :
And both builds are working as they should
Dearest MLADEN
Thanks for adding fl,looking pretty.
what do you means for (auto) ?
regards
I knew you would do right this step - looks really good, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocorrelation An sound an its echo has the autocorrelation 1.
I knew you would do right this step - looks really good, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocorrelation An sound an its echo has the autocorrelation 1.
Dynamic zone Spearman Rank Correlation indicator is on this post. This one is with mtf, alerts and colors when levels are broken so it should cover all the bases. Levels for alert and colors are on dynamic levels too.
It occurred to me that it should be posted here (due to its nature)This is a Spearman rank (auto)correlation that uses floating levels
Upgraded pre-filtered correlations (made a bit more user friendly) :
Dear mladen,
I'm trying to use the "correlations_-_pre_filtered_2.mq4 " indicator which works fine as on line indi but doesn't work in the strategy backtest,
Should be possible to fix it ?
Dear mladen,
I'm trying to use the "correlations_-_pre_filtered_2.mq4 " indicator which works fine as on line indi but doesn't work in the strategy backtest,
Should be possible to fix it ?