Welcome to Forex-TSD!, one of the largest Forex forums worldwide, where you will be able to find the most complete and reliable Forex information imaginable.
From the list below, select the forum that you want to visit and register to post, as many times you want. It’s absolutely free. Click here for registering on Forex-TSD.
Exclusive Forum
The Exclusive Forum is the only paid section. Once you subscribe, you will get free access to real cutting-edge Trading Systems (automated and not), Indicators, Signals, Articles, etc., that will help and guide you, in ways that you could only imagine, with your Forex trading.
Elite Section
Get access to private discussions, specialized support, indicators and trading systems reported every week.
Advanced Elite Section
For professional traders, trading system developers and any other member who may need to use and/or convert, the most cutting-edge exclusive indicators and trading systems for MT4 and MT5.
What was exactly the compatibility problem with the variable "MicroAccount"?
Thanks for your contribution!
When I use MicroAccount=true; and make test Print("MicroAccount=", MicroAccount); , the result is 0 (=false) . The test was done inside LotsOptimized() function. Once made the name change to Micro_Account, every thing works fine, without any other modification.
Maybe is a reserved (not documented) word, I don't know.
Well Fikko. So you've just discovered how to become a millionaire in 6 months with Phoenix. Thought I could keep this a secret for myself .
Problem is, I just changed the code in version 5.6.02 to prevent this. So what should I do? Change it back to the old settings or what? Anyone?
Not a problem.
You can place 2 phoenix, on 2 USDJPY with different setting. It is not necessary to change it back. You just can't see the Excellent result of 1 million in the backtest!!
The secret of 1 million is invented by Hendrick!!!
When I use MicroAccount=true; and make test Print("MicroAccount=", MicroAccount); , the result is 0 (=false) . The test was done inside LotsOptimized() function. Once made the name change to Micro_Account, every thing works fine, without any other modification.
Maybe is a reserved (not documented) word, I don't know.
This is very, very weird!! To play it safe I will change the name of the variable. Thanks!
I like to the idea that we can assign a defined portion of the account to the EA. Than we can use the remaining portion for other activities, like manuallly operation or other EAs without changing the risk.karl
Well Fikko. So you've just discovered how to become a millionaire in 6 months with Phoenix. Thought I could keep this a secret for myself .
Problem is, I just changed the code in version 5.6.02 to prevent this. So what should I do? Change it back to the old settings or what? Anyone?
Hendrick,
Since I seem to be the one that "persuaded" you to make this change, let me suggest how to deal with this while still using the new PhoenixMode variable.
(As long as you agree it's worth to use combined modes?!)
For normal usage, the new single variable is still the best option, so:
Leave the variable as it is right now: 1,2 and 3 for each of the 3 modes.
For the daredevils who want to experiment implement the following:
Just add in the the code to recognise 3 new values (in fact 3 bits):
16 (now also meaning mode1)
32 (now also meaning mode2)
64 (now also meaning mode3)
and any combinations of these values (e.g: 16+64=80 meaning mode1 + mode3)
Sounds complicated but you only have to change 3 lines of code:
Help! New Phoenix is not opening Micro Lots all lots are opening at 0.10, I have put 0.03 in the set-up file so I can open 0.03 (3) times in mode 3, how do I correct the problem? I have Mico Lots as True.
Help! New Phoenix is not opening Micro Lots all lots are opening at 0.10, I have put 0.03 in the set-up file so I can open 0.03 (3) times in mode 3, how do I correct the problem? I have Mico Lots as True.
Take a look to my previous posts, I did some changes
It is true that Phoenix 5 can open up to 5 trades at once, if we switched on all the modes. But I guess it is not tested yet (?)
However I like when seeing combination of the modes, compare to combination of the currency pair. Seeing your success trade on championship, I think better to concentrate on USDJPY rather than concentrating on other pairs.
See this result? it is an amizing Phonex 5, can turn $1000 to $1 million within 6 months of trade. I am using mode 1 and mode 3.
The risk is 0.3, using 2 modes it will consume 60% of the free margin.
It is very great in backtest, but Let's see how it perform in forward test.
Hello , your backtesting is different with the same settings and period. My data and Metatreder are of Alpari broker.Look..
hehe, of course not, in the day time i work in a company and after work i could watch MT4 and make some trades of live account. GMT time is 8 hours slower than Beijing(china) time, between 20:00 to 23:00 of Beijing time is the most active time frame of world forex market, so i can make some trades after work, drinking some tea, watching tv...and thanks for phoenix system, it doesn't make too many trades in a week, about 3-5 trades per week. definitely we could make it manually with other forex trading client software than MT3,MT4.
Nice times foe American open and beyyond, London open first signal(braintrading) second signal in that direction for 10 to 15 pips , allday every day at London open first signal sercond arrow in any direction for 10 to 15 pips compounding HOW LONG TO BE A MILLIONAIRE>>
.
Linear Mode
