Hi David

I have edited the first thread, hopefully ND will delete this thread and put an end to this dicussion, I for one do not have the will to continue with it?

See you on the other forum. :-)

Cheers
Wayne

__________________
FatCat

Have you tried my Signal Service?
http://ffs.ovenstone.net

Hi Devil2000

Thanks for the response, your points are valid and I appreciate your input, learning is all anyone should care about when it comes to Forex, the more one learns, the fewer mistakes one makes, no matter how good a coder or trader you believe you are?

People like you will make it in Forex for your attitude and percertion are good and if you maintain them and do not get caught up in the "funny" stuff that goes on, you should and probobly will succeed in Forex.

Good luck to you and stay positive.
Wayne

__________________
FatCat

Have you tried my Signal Service?
http://ffs.ovenstone.net

The most amazing thing is that this guy takes the time to say that this thread is useless? He must have taken the time to read it and then post his opinion, which he is now trying to force on everyone else?

There are some really strange people here, if this lad finds it useless, why not just leave it alone and not return?
Some people just have to be nasty, I find this really strange and often wonder why they need to do this?

Cheers
Wayne

__________________
FatCat

Have you tried my Signal Service?
http://ffs.ovenstone.net

Thanks Wayne,
Good luck to you too

__________________
Need a professional MQL4 programmer? PM me

Victor to an certain extend I agree with you.
Sure there needs to be a plan before the project starts. But expecting nothing is going to change goes a bit to far for me.
Why do programmers release alpha and beta code?
To follow your logic they can start typing and when they are done they have a final release that can be send to the client without any testing.
I think that's not how things work in real life. So why should a system designer have everything flawless at first attempt?

Even a system with good logic can somehow fail. I agree it should be visually backtested more than 3 trades before it gets coded.
But how much is humanly possible. Some startegies require a fair deal of calculation. Say you designed something for D1. Even then you need to watch all M1 bars (ticks would be better) to check if intraday pullbacks hit a stop. Because we want a statistically valid system we need to test many trades. And ofcourse with all market conditions.

On one side of the spectrum there is the designer that gets a tought. Checks one trade and calls the coder.
On teh other side of the spectrum is the designer that checks thousands of setups and just when he's done he dies of old age.
There is also a way in the middle where designers are allowed to change and coder allowed to have alpha and beta releases

On top of that it often seems impossible to convert a very profitable manual system into code.

Just my 2 pips (micro lots)

__________________
TraderSeven,
May the pips be with you.

Wayne,

I didn't mean to force you, no.. not at all

Not bad idea, but where is the idea? if you want to make it private, Why you announce it to public? That's really strange...
If you don't trust public why public should trust you..

OK.. Just forget what I said before.. but it will change nothing..
you and david already know that this thread is useless.
This is wrong approach to find coders...

Will ND will delete this thread? I don't know..

I'm not strange people, What I did was only to suggest you..
I won't make anymore comments or argue in this thread..


Nevermind
Pj

__________________
You said "why?".. I said "why not?!"
Broker for 5$ Free
Trading system 4free

I don't think the thread is useless at all. Regarding trust, Wayne's been actively participating here and on a few other forums for a long time, and anyone who isn't familiar with his work can soon check out what he has to offer using the search facility. He's a man with absolute integrity, he's got a bunch of great idea's, and he's great to work with.

He's worked with numerous coders, many of whom still check these forums periodically, and many of whom would no doubt be interested in working with him again under the appropriate circumstances. Announcing a new project here at TSD is entirely appropriate.

More importantly Wayne's also one of the very few people who's always happy to give new people a break, and offer a chance to anyone who wants to take it. Although most programmers who've responded to date want a 100% cast iron guarantee that they'll be working on the holy grail, not everyone thinks the same way. For the right person this is a golden opportunity to work with a great bunch of people and to actually achieve something.


regards
zu

Wayne, I know who you are then, on ET. Good luck with everything, and yes, I wouldn't search hard for anyone else on this forum. My last post summed it all up.

Try contacting 'wookey', although I'm not sure if he'd be interested, but he's by far the best programmer on this board. That is, if you are in need of more programming power.

best,
Scott

Hi Kamper,

I'm still a junior member here and I helped a few people in this forum. I'm not a programmer but I can program. I'm a mechanical engineer and willing to help with this project. Send me a private message if you are interested. I don't have any terms and conditions etc.

I only hope that I can trade for a living one day.

Best regards
Derik

Hi PJ

Thanks for the response and yes you are correct, everyone has their own opinion, and in this instance we just choose to have different opinions? Maybe next time we will agree? Who knows?

Hi Mick
Shew, what a nice thing to say, you flatter me, I am honoured, thank you very much.

Hi Scott
Thanks for the advice regarding "wookey", but I think we are ok for a coder, David helped us find a guy by the name of Jonathan, who seems to be a really nice person and his code looks solid. Hopefully him and David will work well together.

Cheers
Wayne

__________________
FatCat

Have you tried my Signal Service?
http://ffs.ovenstone.net