Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Oidunno
PS to last post.....
As an example of what can be done just as an example ...with spreads.. check this idea out.A Trader to trader market WITHOUT spreads.
http://www.gftforex.com/software/dealbookfx/itx.asp
and before anyone comments.. Niether I (nor my granny or her cat)have ANYTHING TO DO WITH GFT. I dont' know them I don't use them, I know nothing about them other than that I came across this on their site by accident and as a service it seems like a cracker of an idea.
But seriously...So many people tell me they trade FX futures in preference because of the brokerage costs (spread) on spot. Just read Oanda article on the real cost of the spread.Check out OANDA on this ... it's scary.. http://fxtrade.oanda.com/spreads/recent_spreads.shtml
...another 0.00000000002 $ worth
Hi Ho XAG Away...
Cliff
|
Hi.
Dear Oidunno. I´ve read your last posts and I would like to share some things about that.
According to your fist post.
In the US, the regulations are the same like in the rest of the world, very poor. UK have FSC regulations, Canada have regulations, "country name" have regulations.
Canada is an example of regulations to take care the investor not the company (take a look at the CIPF site).
This item was discussed several pages ago.
We need to make difference between the market inself and the brokers/companies. Regulations are for the broker/companies not for the market, because the Forex market is a wolrdwide market, what is equal to unregulated market because it´s impossible to that due to current international law. Main players are central banks and they are fully independant

.
There is not thing like UN, International Anti Money Laundering, International Court of Justice, etc.
Some super body which is one step above national constitutions and in range of international law in order to fulfill and to make fulfill them (pacta sun servanda).
And you have one more concern, if the adoption of the rules provided by the entities mentioned above are not an obligation for the country (IE: US rejects to join to International Court of Justice) it´s almost impossible to set some international regulation for the forex market (avoiding the differences between the international order and one market

)
In brief: how do you tell to a broker based in "put contry name", hey, you must fullfill these rules.
Ok, now I have to write a little more.
According to the tittle in the web page: Forex-TSD Metatrader,I assume we are in a metratader plaftorm forum. So, sometimes we/I be mention non metatrader brokers but the main true behind if we´re here to talk about Metatrader.
If we start some classification of brokerage houses we must focus on Metatrader Brokers to honor the forum.
That´s is good but incomplete, because there are a lot of brokerage houses with different platforms.
And if we only publish MT brokerage houses we are doing lobby for only a couple of brokers and we wan´t to do that, we want to provide a service for the beginner, right?
And, by the last point: how to probe independance?.
Every people can register for free and publish their opinions.
How to probe they´re not in some relationship with some broker?
How to probe they´re not had some trouble and hates some broker? talking from the rage and not from the eye of an independant viewer.
How to probe brokers answers in the questionaire are full truth?
How to prevent to fall in the same way that another sites if you can´t guarantee independence?
We´re the money to maintain the site come from?
But not are bad point to me. The idea is excelent and I believe the best aproach is to create some international association of traders with a paid subscription using the new wikipedia rules.
When you got some association with 10k members you´re start to be important.
When you got some association with 25k members you´re start to be the place in when the brokers don´t like to have negative opinions
When you got some association with 50k members you´re start to set the rules
Just my little opinion.