would you pls share us which timeframe do you use?

I found a rather "unusual" application for this 10point3 EA, that seams to be very profitable.

Use these settings:
Trade only EURUSD
TP 35
Initial Stop 35
Max trades 1 (yes 1, so no martingaling here!)
Pips 35
Sec Profit 35

Reverse Condition: 1

You let the EA run in a demo account and you trade the exact opposite of the trades it initiate. I suggest Oanda for minimal spread, because your winners will be +33 and your losers -37.

Your first reaction will be: Well, put than the EA in "reverse condition: 0" and let it simply run. But this yields a complete different result.

I manually backtested this in different periods (only 2 months ) and it seams quite robust. In June 2006, it gives not so best results, but overall it doesn't loses also. I chose June 2006 because it was flat.

Last 3 weeks +575 pips.

i saw this EA has big DD, ant some strategy tester i saw, they finish dramatically. especially when the max trade fail to cover the signal. my idea is simple. Hedging.but not like other 10point.... hedging, my idea is hedging in one pair,one EA, not put 2 EA one for sell and one for buy, NO.

i think, hedging is the safest way today for trading FX. don;t think profit, think safety first, and smallest DD is better...
Thanks

This unusual application has big DD - its to bad for me.

This is my forward testing statement since January this year.
Initial deposit 5,000.
Annual ROI: 91%
Max floating DD = 12.8% since January 2008 forward testing.
Starting lot size = 0.01.

Setting: http://www.forex-tsd.com/177588-post3257.html
11 pairs.
H1 timeframe.
Minimum recommended capital for this set-up is $3000 for every 0.01 lot (it may be changed anytime to more highier value as it is martingale EA you know). So, I am using 5,000 initial deposite (that is more good than 3,000 anyway).

10p3v003_normalstatement_2206.gif

12% DD for half a year trading is not a bad for martingale system.

Attached Files

10p3v003_normalstatement_2206.htm (1.69 MB, 102 views)

H1, Just look at the new post newdigital put up, that should help you.

Thanks newdigital, you´re soo great guy.

So I am testing 10p3v0.03 EA (EA is here).

davidke20 developed next version: 10p3v0.04 EA 10p3 - Multi currency pair
What is the differencies between 10p3v0.04 EA and 10p3v0.03 EA? In 10p3v0.03 EA (i am testing it - see my previous post) EA will trade all the pairs. For example, I attached this EA to 11 pairs. 3 pairs got the signal and EA will trade those 3 pairs. Simultaniously. Just for example.
For 10p3v0.04 EA: EA will trade one pair only even if it is attached to 11 pairs (with same magic number). So, we may use the same settings for 10p3v0.04 EA as for 10p3v0.03 EA.
It will not help to reduce minimum deposit requirement but it will reduce the risk (and DD) a lot. ROI may be 70% (not 90% as for 10p3v0.03) but your deposit will be more safe in case of 10p3v0.04 version. We may use same settings as 10p3v0.04 is almost same version with 10p3v0.03.

As to 10p3v1.01 version so I did not test it. But as additional indicator was added so this 10p3v1.01 is different EA and we should use different settings. May be, minimum deposit requirement will be less for this 10p3v1.01 EA.

ND,
You showed us here some astonishing results for 10p3v0.03 EA! I tested it on FXDD data (and changed the trade time settings to ET) but could not match your results. I had till 9 multiplications (2.56 lots) on the main pairs and it blows itselves up for the volatile pairs: EURJPY GBPJPY and USDCAD.
Your curve is sooooo smooth I see no big lot sizes at all in it!!! I controled the statement in detail and found max lot size 0.64. What am I missing? First thing I will do is test also on Alpari and come back.

Also on Alpari EURUSD I encountered 9 steps (lot size 2.56). I controled the settings twice, they are like yours.
What is the experience of other members ?