You are not reading the thread. I am posting the statements periodically starting from January this year and I did not change the settings, timeframe and account.
Settings is on this post http://www.forex-tsd.com/177588-post3257.html
Timeframe (H1) and pairs is on this post http://www.forex-tsd.com/177587-post3256.html

The thread is big but concerning my testing so it may be good to read starting from this page 10points 3.mq4 (page #310).

Under development and test it on both live and demo. The above is a 200$ demo account just emulating the live one.

newdigital.
I've been testing this system with the ea Version 0.03.
I saw your results you posted from January 6th to april 8th. (10points 3.mq4).
I looked in your statement, focusing eur-usd.
In your results on 25-mar-08, this pair was in trade at evening hours, in profit, while in my system this pair was in trade in the early morning hours and that caused the account to be in a big loss.
Pls see my attachment and tell me why is this big difference happening.

Attached Files

eur-usd 10point3 0.03.zip (106.9 KB, 105 views)

Simply answer is backtesting is never same than live test

And even same ea with 100% same setting but different broker give different results in live test.

My statement is forward testing. It means that I attached EA to the charts (11 charts) in January this year with this settings http://www.forex-tsd.com/177588-post3257.html and this pairs http://www.forex-tsd.com/177587-post3256.html

As I understand this EA is using MACD indicator and timeframe for trading is very important in this case. I am using H1 timeframe as the author suggested. I never changed timeframe and the settings and I am still testing on the same account.

Change timeframe to H1. EA will not trade often but it will be less of risky. By the way my starting deposit is 5,000.

If I will continue forward testing with this settings/timeframe for 1 year so initial deposit 5,000 will be increased up to 10,000 with max DD = 19% (for all 11 pairs all together now, but it may be more later ... who knows ...it is martingale).

Let's see how the situation will be going. I will inform regularly about performance of course.

10point33004.jpg

Thanks for answering so quickly.

Nice thread here.

Hi,
Here's the live performance since these two weeks with my latest version 10p-hedge. for security reason i hide the name and account number. Non stop ea even in NFP.

Attached Files

live_performance.rar (10.3 KB, 120 views)

Which settings you use - the same like newdigital? When I use 0,1 Lot the account falls into minus (-) So the deposit must be enormous. I think 10.000 minimum.

My exsaminion has just started but so far i have give asnwer to myself that any less 1000
base unist is too small to run anykind of mantigale based EA to in even one single curency.

It´s sadly to read storys where fouks blow up they accounts when running too little money martingale based systems.