Welcome to Forex-TSD!, one of the largest Forex forums worldwide, where you will be able to find the most complete and reliable Forex information imaginable.
From the list below, select the forum that you want to visit and register to post, as many times you want. It’s absolutely free. Click here for registering on Forex-TSD.
Exclusive Forum
The Exclusive Forum is the only paid section. Once you subscribe, you will get free access to real cutting-edge Trading Systems (automated and not), Indicators, Signals, Articles, etc., that will help and guide you, in ways that you could only imagine, with your Forex trading.
Elite Section
Get access to private discussions, specialized support, indicators and trading systems reported every week.
Advanced Elite Section
For professional traders, trading system developers and any other member who may need to use and/or convert, the most cutting-edge exclusive indicators and trading systems for MT4 and MT5.
Close to the weekend and I have made another detailed statement from the time I changed firstly to time limited and then secondly when I turned it off. I have changed the settings to value 2 because the account is mini and 2 = 20 pips.
There has been a remarkable improvement since removing the time limitations, it was suggestion by neta1o and David kindly coded it but it seems that the EA can handle itself without help over the more buoyant trading periods.
Also is attached the entire trading period and even after the loss of profit from the reversal and also the time limitations the EA has almost recovered.
As has been said before "if it ain't broke dont fix it" but hopefully the additional features proposed by neta1o will only improve FXAO.
I hope to load the EA proposed by master100 with the start of the new week and will as always keep postimg the results of my forward testing.
Hi Guys, I am going to forward test FXA0 - Ladderv0-T-JMA.mq4 next week but just wanted to confirm that 1H TF is used and the default values in the EA are what your all using?
This thing isn't there yet because live is much different then backtesting for various reasons. But I have some other developments that could get this thing performing even better.
Hi Guys, I am going to forward test FXA0 - Ladderv0-T-JMA.mq4 next week but just wanted to confirm that 1H TF is used and the default values in the EA are what your all using?
Here is my redesigned version of neta1o. my version tries to use 4H and 1H timeframe positive divergences of TURBO-JMA. If 4h TURBO-JMA and 1H TURBO-JMA have the same direction then open position.
I think that maxtrade set to 3 is ok. So i resigned from changing this parameter. Another important thing: i belive that in order to balance loosing money there should be adjusted in more precious way THE LOTS PROGRESSION. My expierience indicates that the biggest part of money should be engaged into the most volatile part of movement during the trend. THE TREND IS LIKE A CORRIDOR WHICH HAS BOTTOM, TOP AND THE MIDDLE PART. So if we have 3 maxtrades we use 7*0.1 in order: 0.1 0.2 0.4. The most volatile part of TREND CORRIDOR is the MIDDLE PART. So i set progression: 0.1 0.4 0.2. This gives more profit, look at the raports, the most transactions are made with the middle lots.
I have made many test on different broker with different quality modellnig. Im really depressed and i feel very bad the even data from alpari with 90% quality modelling gives creazy results. I noticed that it is almost impossible to test any EA !!! All kinds of data are crazy.
My observations indicates that the most successful in not loosing money is not trading. So all EAs must treat equally not trading with selling and buying! Even in the strongest trends we can see backmoves of prices, so we never know if it is the beggining of trend reversal or good occasion to enter.
I propose to test systems in FEBRUARY 2007, that month was very creazy for GBPUSD. In that month you have the mixture of 2 kinds of market behaviour: waves and breakouts. 10pointsXXX is kind of wave(trend) following system, so it has many problems during breakouts. So i think that breakouts are very big problems, i think that there are needed very special exepctions for system to cut loosing money in breakouts.
Trying to adjust EA to ranging and trending market is very lagged. I think that more usable conceptions is to have eg. 4 lots for trending and 3 for ranging or make more elastic distance changing between lots. In stead of 15 pips there could be calculations of levels from CCi eg. 0.1 lot over 0.00, another 0.1 over 100, another 0.1 over 200.
master001
Do I run this on a 4hr tf?
And I take it I also load these 2 indictors for this version?
Do I use the default settings for ea and indicators?
Do I run this on a 4hr tf?
And I take it I also load these 2 indictors for this version?
Do I use the default settings for ea and indicators?
Rick,
I have loaded both indicators and you will find very little to set for this EA so I have loaded it with default settings. I am using H4 as the original version with GU & EU.
Thanks for your testing and reporting lately, I am sure that neta1o and master001 have gained further insight from your posts.
John
Last edited by yeoeleven; 07-28-2007 at 09:42 PM.
Reason: omitted the TF
Linear Mode
