Welcome to Forex-TSD!, one of the largest Forex forums worldwide, where you will be able to find the most complete and reliable Forex information imaginable.
From the list below, select the forum that you want to visit and register to post, as many times you want. It’s absolutely free. Click here for registering on Forex-TSD.
Exclusive Forum
The Exclusive Forum is the only paid section. Once you subscribe, you will get free access to real cutting-edge Trading Systems (automated and not), Indicators, Signals, Articles, etc., that will help and guide you, in ways that you could only imagine, with your Forex trading.
Elite Section
Get access to private discussions, specialized support, indicators and trading systems reported every week.
Advanced Elite Section
For professional traders, trading system developers and any other member who may need to use and/or convert, the most cutting-edge exclusive indicators and trading systems for MT4 and MT5.
I am usually a thread watcher and not a poster but this EA has intrigued me so much that I have felt inclined to post. I think the real gem of this EA is the WFM, but I have had limited success with the kayvan method, ma entry with pip distance, nor have I had much success with the wild and wacky PIPIDIOT. That thing is crazy.
Anyways, I would like to see an EMA cross built into TFX 1.8b. Entry lag after the cross tro weed out bad signals, and have it be flexible to fit the traders style so someone could play with a 5/13 or a 10/50. Put a stop/reverse on an opposite cross and thats it. I would also like to see a pivot point cross with lag entry. We already have a TP and trailer built in, we are just adding a different entry and exit methods.
How do you suggest we manage the HUGE growing floating loss that will happen when we only close winning trades? I just don't think it is a practical idea.
Wolfe
we can determine TP for every order when there is no such volatility in market. and set it to false(or Zero) when there is enough volatility . with this we had collected so many pips in non movement hours . and a few orders left, will balance themselves by market movements.
another option we need is , to be able to determine pip distance
thanks wolfe for your attention . either do it or not
How about closing all the floating when the profit reaches for certain trade?
For Example:
0.1 lot is losing with floating -20pips
enter another trade reverse direction 0.3 and go for about 5 pips and close it. And keeping the principle like this until it recovers the - 20 pips? NOT GOOD IDEA? if you don't like the idea please go to "pipmaker" threat. The principle is the same but not martingale. Over there we have the same problem with floating losses. And the latest version of the pipmaker has Loss Management system included. So why don't you check it out! Maybe you will have some ideas. . .
I am usually a thread watcher and not a poster but this EA has intrigued me so much that I have felt inclined to post. I think the real gem of this EA is the WFM, but I have had limited success with the kayvan method, ma entry with pip distance, nor have I had much success with the wild and wacky PIPIDIOT. That thing is crazy.
Anyways, I would like to see an EMA cross built into TFX 1.8b. Entry lag after the cross tro weed out bad signals, and have it be flexible to fit the traders style so someone could play with a 5/13 or a 10/50. Put a stop/reverse on an opposite cross and thats it. I would also like to see a pivot point cross with lag entry. We already have a TP and trailer built in, we are just adding a different entry and exit methods.
Just some ideas. Hope you decide to include them.
Thanks for the WFM compliment, if anything good has come out of the development of this EA it's probably that. WFM could be applied to many different EA's.
An EMA cross would be pretty easy to apply to TFX. I'll try to do that when I get a chance. The only problem I have found with EMA cross systems is that they usually lag in signal. Often when the signal comes, it's too late and now a false signal. Might work on lower time frames though.
Wolfe
we can determine TP for every order when there is no such volatility in market. and set it to false(or Zero) when there is enough volatility . with this we had collected so many pips in non movement hours . and a few orders left, will balance themselves by market movements.
another option we need is , to be able to determine pip distance
thanks wolfe for your attention . either do it or not
Kayvan,
Still seems pretty confusing to code, and risky to me.
Still seems pretty confusing to code, and risky to me.
then , can you add an MA (in Tfx_kayvan EA), so if a candle closes below the MA goes for short . and if a candle closes above the MA goes for buy ? how about Digit Trend ? Try it ,it works excellent(attach is the latest updated)
then , can you add an MA (in Tfx_kayvan EA), so if a candle closes below the MA goes for short . and if a candle closes above the MA goes for buy ? how about Digit Trend ? Try it ,it works excellent(attach is the latest updated)
Kayvan,
Do you have the mq4 for this indicator? It's nice to have if you want to include it in an EA.
then , can you add an MA (in Tfx_kayvan EA), so if a candle closes below the MA goes for short . and if a candle closes above the MA goes for buy ? how about Digit Trend ? Try it ,it works excellent(attach is the latest updated)
Hi Kayvan
I don't understand how is working this indicator.
Could you explain it, please ?
Linear Mode
