http://www.forex-tsd.com/194642-post1133.html

Can you do the backtest?

ES

you can do it...do not give up...it will be unique to WFM and no else will have accomplished it thus far..

ES

Perhaps,

If you have the time we can we get the PipSpace™? and the Time Choke™

But I understand you are getting busy these day's...so we are just going to need to be patient.

ES

you mean i am crazy . to require such a stupid thing ?

i say 10 pips tp for each order and a ...?? tp for remaining orders .
thus we can add an option to be able to put order every 2 pips or 3 pips or ... more distance .as trader wants .

This is what you requested in big red letters below.

Then you start talking about another system that used 10 pips TP on the NFP...what is it kayvan...what will it be?

First you come here and have the Holy Grail

Then you modify it to the second holy grail..

now you want another method...

In the other thread at pipmaker you complained that they would not listen to you...geeeee...I wonder why?

ES

P.S. I am not going to ask wolfe or Ralph FOR ONE MORE THING, unless YOU pay them for it kayvan. I am out of here...

wich time and pairs works this expert?

Okay. I wanted to try to improve the TFX_1_8 version a little by looking at an indicator called 'trendtraffic'. I know it is posted here in forex-tsd but I do not remember the link. In this EA, I modified the use Moving Average code to look at trend traffic, it has a fast moving average and slow moving average along with shift. I've been back testing this a little on the eur/jpy and it looks promising. Here is the EA and the .set file. Please let me know what you think. I admit I'm no expert, but someone might also come up with another idea for entry and exit for this EA. My main concern regarding it is that it 'churns', meaning that it open and closes a lot of positions. This uses the choose your own progression. This is set up for someone who might try this on a mini account, feel free to find the best settings as I am also forward testing this on IBFX.

Thanks,
Bluesky

Attached Files

	tfxv18_trendtraffic_m1_250.set (4.3 KB, 119 views)
	TFX v1_8_trendtraffic.mq4 (63.1 KB, 192 views)

On cable this morning, the overall profit was more than +52, when closing, net loss was -36. Over 240 orders had to be closed.
Anyway, the name of the EA is very much suitable.

i meant 1 tp for avery order . it means that 1 tp could be 5 or 10 or 15 or 20 or ..........

in another word :We need 2 kind of tp , one ,for every order , and another for remaining orders.that we have this second option now(WFM)
this will certainly reduce our order mass , and . we will earn more profit in none trade hours .with less remaining orders left .

E.S you are always looking for my mistakes in dictations. please read them deeply and understand me that i can not write and read as well as you can.

Yes, ES misunderstood. I think you mean there to be two different reasons for closing an order: 1) if "its own" TP is reached, or 2) if a combined TP is reached.

Now, I also think that if doing so (i.e. the "own TP" closing), it will kill the hedging effect, and have the result of collecting losers and paying more dearly for them, since they no longer will have hedging trades to balance them.

On the side: by closing buys and sells pairwise, the EA actually avoids one of the trade spreads. Ordinarily a buy is closed against Bid and a sell against Ask. When closing pairwise, the buy and sell are closed against the same price, which thus saves one spread.