Martingale EA - Page 103

ElectricSavant · #**1021** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 09:38 PM

I think that wolfe and kayvans inputs are all that is needed...I should have never contributed to this thread...all my stuff is not needed or used...

It's ok...just so we get a profitable EA out of this...is all that I care. This has been far too much work...

ES

ElectricSavant · #**1022** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 09:42 PM

I do not know

Quote:

Originally Posted by kayvan

what do you mean?

kayvan · #**1023** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElectricSavant

ok...but the entire EA does not use progression anymore..

Can you list what inputs that would reamin..

Try kayvan...please try...

List the inputs one by one...They are listed below...which ones are active and which one are not...and are there any new ones?

ES

Start_Lot_Size=0.10000000(0.1)
Lot_Size_Increment=0.10000000(every 1 pip movement 0.1)
Long_Short_Balance=0(no need . market will do it)
Balance_Weight=0.10000000
Double_Lotsize=0(no need)
Choose_Own_Progression=1
Trade_1=0.10000000(0.1)
Trade_2=0.20000000
Trade_3=0.30000000
Trade_4=0.50000000
Trade_5=0.80000000
Trade_6=1.30000000
Trade_7=2.10000000
Trade_8=3.40000000
Trade_9=5.50000000
Trade_10=8.90000000
Trade_11=14.40000000
Trade_12=0.00000000
Trade_13=0.00000000
Trade_14=0.00000000
Trade_15=0.00000000
Trade_16=0.00000000
Trade_17=0.00000000
Trade_18=0.00000000
Trade_19=0.00000000
Trade_20=0.00000000(all with 0.1)
Max_Trades=12(not limited)
Close_All_Max=1
Pyramid=1
Auto_Restart=1
Use_MA_Entry=0
Next_Trade=20
MA_Period=7
MA_Timeframe=60
Use_Kayvan_Method=1
Bar_Timeframe=5
Bars_Look_Back=2.00000000(1)
EntryLag_Long=3(2)
EntryLag_Short=3(2)
Last_Entry_Filter=1(no need)
Use_Trailing_Stop=1
Trail_Start=2.00000000
TSLoss_Percent=50.00000000
Close_By_Percent=0
TP_Percent=5.00000000
SL_Percent=10.00000000
Close_By_Profit=99999.00000000
Close_By_StopLoss=99999.00000000
Slippage=3
Number_Of_Tries=5
Sound=1

i hope you got your answer . why you don`t look again at charts that i atached before . every thing is clear on them. red lines are 0.1 sell orders and blue lines are 0.1 buy orders

ElectricSavant · #**1024** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 09:48 PM

Thank you kayvan for your time.

This may work....

but when I look at the charts...what if the 18 short orders was not enough and the price goes back up...?....then down again....

Wouldn't this be a more chop sensive method compared to the current research?

We may need to use 0.01 per 1K and wait a very long time for very little?

ES

ElectricSavant · #**1025** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 09:56 PM

your chart is NOT showing one pip intervals....

wait a minute

Quote:

Originally Posted by kayvan

Here you are Wolfe:

kayvan · #**1026** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajk

A lot of entries at first glance. Again, like people are reading . K will need
to explain in detail
1st trade - goes where.
2nd progression = goes where...
3.) get out goes where.
without it, its a mess.

how do you dare enter the trade while you are at your 7 progression level with 6.4 lot size and it is equal to 64 orders with 0.1 lot size ? and don`t dare to enter with 10 or 15 or 20 orders with 0.1 lot size in your first entry ? is it logical to enter with such a lot size while we don`t know if the market will moves or not ?

1----first trade goes where we take tp
2----the second as the first
3----i diden`t understand this one please explain it clearly

ElectricSavant · #**1027** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 09:57 PM

Chart kayvan posted...

Martingale EA

kayvan · #**1028** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElectricSavant

your chart is NOT showing one pip intervals....

wait a minute

that was because of my bad drawing lines.

the second one has less bugs

you assume they are 1 pip by 1 pip

kayvan · #**1029** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElectricSavant

Thank you kayvan for your time.

This may work....

but when I look at the charts...what if the 18 short orders was not enough and the price goes back up...?....then down again....

Wouldn't this be a more chop sensive method compared to the current research?

We may need to use 0.01 per 1K and wait a very long time for very little?

ES

can you show me like you said on a chart? specially @ m15?

ElectricSavant · #**1030** (**permalink**) 03-01-2008, 10:06 PM

No I can't...it would be very much work to follow all those bars and annotate a "bad trade"...To annotate a long lasting bad trade would not give me enough chart to show it...it is not technically possible to show this as a screenshot and make it visable.

But conceptually wouldn't this be a chop sensitive animal?

ES

P.S. But I am game...I will try any method at this point...as I understand this EA and I have spent a lot of time on this...so I am grabbing at straws...by the way I agree with you about the 6.4 decision...it is not comfortable.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kayvan

can you show me like you said on a chart? specially @ m15?