Maybe it is time to end the everlasting "does it repaint" dispute about any variation or implementation of Ehlers' Fisher Transform on Metatrader

Two versions of Ehlers' Fisher Transform : the "classical" one and the histogram version
Both are coded exactly the same way the originals are

The biggest difference among these two and other "non repainting" ones is the way maximum and minimum are searched for : from original it is clear that those are searched for within chosen price, not within highs and lows (when not done that way peaks that are clearly defined in these indicators are lost, and thus one of the most useful informations from this indicator is lost)

And no, none of these two indicators does not repaint

Attached Images

	fisher 1.gif (16.8 KB, 1598 views)
	fisher 2.gif (18.2 KB, 1591 views)

Attached Files

	Using The Fisher Transform.pdf (57.0 KB, 508 views)
	Ehlers Fisher transform.mq4 (2.4 KB, 138 views)
	Ehlers Fisher transform histo.mq4 (3.6 KB, 163 views)

dear malden;

thanks for your big contribution in this forum in all areas, but can you please illustrate more on how to trade fisher tranform.

thnx again...

Green buy, red sell.

Thanks mladen, great post...

Cheers

Ethan Hunt

Hi, wise words.

I would like to add something. The main problem seems to be the old "I don´t like to read".
I´m saying this because all confusion had begin with some versions of one indicator (wrongly)called Fisher and sometimes with other called Fisher Yur4ik, both indicator have nothing to do real Fisher and of course that repaints. But these versions where heavily discussed demonstrating that repaints not only by backtest, also for expert coders too.

But because this indicators promised to see the future at first contact (also called miracle indicator) had high impact that the real one thought by John Ehlers and explained in the book Rocket Science for Traders.

We have discussed this indicator since the first days of 2006 trying to banish the wrong ones and still same question is coming and going, coming and going.
Maybe we need to go one step further a just delete the versions which are wrong. But this is not the forum style. At least if we read the thread we have an example of a bad coding.

The initial thread is here: Fisher

Let´s keep this thread separated from the other and maybe we could help to avoid future confusions.

__________________

Elite Manual Trading | Portfolio | Calendar | Suggestions to improve the forum | My Blog

Remember: Signatures must have three lines as maximum

exactly, Linux - delete it - it will pop -up again and again, change name form and shape....
people want to believe in miracles (i don't, but i believe in Santa Claus)

Hello to All
Is there any one please can provide me some explanation about how to use this Indicator The center of Gravity.
I will be Thankful

Hello to All;
Is there any one can help me please to tell me how can I use this Indicator.
I will be Thankful

Also you will have the indicator in the attachment

Attached Images

indicator.gif (37.1 KB, 1124 views)

Attached Files

	Center of Gravity 1.mq4 (5.4 KB, 283 views)
	center of gravity.tpl (2.9 KB, 220 views)

The file attached in this post explains all.

__________________

Elite Manual Trading | Portfolio | Calendar | Suggestions to improve the forum | My Blog

Remember: Signatures must have three lines as maximum

One more confusion on its way to build up

As Igorad already explained in this post http://www.forex-tsd.com/179205-post56.html, the indicator from your post is a Polynomial Regression Line + ... (originally developed by ang - the original posted here as well. Notice that ang never did call it a "Center of gravity" Center of gravity is a completely different indicator)

btw: be very careful with the use of the indicator you posted - it is going to change itself constantly (ang is too good a mathematician and a coder in order to use the ugly word "repaint" but that is exactly what it is going to do)

Attached Files

ang_PR (Din)-v1+SQStdN.mq4 (5.0 KB, 87 views)