-Quick Note-
The only indicator thats core is different then the rest is the Coeffoflinev1. It worrys me a little because that one maybe have the loop fix in it, and that might explain why it gives different signals then the others. The other ones posted by newdigital are all the same and correlate to the coeffofline_hist originally posted in the thread.
I also wanted to be clear. I honestly have no clue wether this indicator actually does retrace and loopitself. I havent been able to test while the market was open. I was told this on one of the above posts, aswell, I came across what seemed to be a similar conversation on the problem, but it was in russian. Other then that, it could have been fixed months ago and I have spent the last 14 hours of my time..lol... running around for no reason. Anyways, I hope we can get a programmer to look it over. Thanks again newdigital.

-secXces

Beluck,
I just posted before I got a chance to read your post. Thanks much, I will go over that one aswell. Million thanks to you.
-secXces

Beluck,
Going thru the code I noticed only one signifcant change. I have highlighted them in bold.

(FIXED VERSION)
ZYVar=ZYVar+(High[shift+cnt-1]+Low[shift+cnt-1])/2*(ndot+1-cnt);
TYVar=TYVar+(High[shift+cnt-1]+Low[shift+cnt-1])/2;
ZIndicatorVar=ZIndicatorVar+iMA(NULL,0,5,3,MODE_SM MA,PRICE_MEDIAN,shift+cnt-1)*(ndot+1-cnt);
TIndicatorVar=TIndicatorVar+iMA(NULL,0,5,3,MODE_SM MA,PRICE_MEDIAN,shift+cnt-1);

(ORGINAL VERSION)
ZYVar=ZYVar+(High[shift-cnt+1]+Low[shift-cnt+1])/2*(ndot+1-cnt);
TYVar=TYVar+(High[shift-cnt+1]+Low[shift-cnt+1])/2;
ZIndicatorVar=ZIndicatorVar+iMA(NULL,0,5,3,MODE_SM MA,PRICE_MEDIAN,shift-cnt+1)*(ndot+1-cnt);
TIndicatorVar=TIndicatorVar+iMA(NULL,0,5,3,MODE_SM MA,PRICE_MEDIAN,shift-cnt+1);


Beluck,
Have you seen this on a chart live? Does it do the same as the Original, like loop itsef or change its history?

-secXces

I just realized when looking over my last post, the bold areas did not appear. Basically it just the code below:

shift+cnt-1
shift-cnt+1

The + and - are different in the two codes. There are different on five different occasions. Two In the frist line, Two in the second line and Once again in the last line. I dont think this will have anythng to do with loop but I maybe be wrong. This seems just to shift the indicator over.

So my journey continues...lol


-secXces

Secxces,
I don`t think you understand what "looping" is.

It`s when the time to calculate the bars in the code takes
longer than 1000ms.

Your processor determines how fast this is done.

The fix in the mt3 code is pretty simple:

change Beginbars to 1000 (or less if you have a slow puter).

Inputs: BeginBars(1000)

Hey Bill,

I see what your saying. I dont know the actuall term for what the indicator is doing when it like changes its history. When i seen the fix in the mt3 version I assumed it was something to do with a loop. LOL. And then I keep using the word "retrace" which doesnt even seem to really describe what it was doing, but i think you got the idea. Can you fix the MT4 coeffofline_hist? you seem very knowledgable.

Thanks
-secXces

-Quick Note-
I have watched "coeffofline_hist" on a live chart. And "YES, IT DOES CHANGE ITS HISTORY ON NEW BARS, MAJOR CHANGES ASWELL". From what I have seen and the way it operates, I really dont think it is even possible to emulate the way it looks in backtesting or in its history, etc. I kinda seen this when I was looking into the indicator before, something I had seen in the history werent possible, I mean the indicator couldnt have predicted the big drops and such. So, I have come to a conclusion, this indicator officially sint a good one in my opinion. lol. 24 Hours, 13 Emails, 9 Posts, 22 Translations from Russian to English, 3 Conversations with programmers, and One Customer Suport Session later, I find myself in the same place. Good Trading to all this week.

**May the pips fall from the Heavens and land in all of your Accounts**

- secXces