Forex
Google
New signals service!

Go Back   Forex Trading > Discussion Areas > General Discussion


Register in Forex TSD!
Trading Systems Leaders in this forum (automated trading systems) are winning more than 3000 pips in a month (30000$ investing one lot every time).
Click here to register and get more information

Reply
 
LinkBack (35) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #451 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2008, 03:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 211
forexsavior is on a distinguished road
The Dark Regulator

With the Dark Knight breaking box office records around the world it looks like the CFTC is trying to cash in on the caped crusaders popularity. In a recent press release announcing the formation of a forex fraud taskforce the CFTC stated, This announcement sends a clear signal that the CFTC is on the beat, and that our continued and increased cooperation with law enforcement authorities will help put these forex dealers where they belong in jail.

CFTC Announces Formation of Retail Foreign Currency Fraud Enforcement Task Force

Ya I know many of you are chuckling to yourselves, in classic Joker style, ha, ha, ha, and I thought my jokes were bad. Forex fraud has been rampant the last couple years and like the hapless gang at the Gotham police department the regulators can never seem to get the bad guys who remain safely tucked away like Lau from the Dark Knight hiding out in his Hong Kong skyscraper. Only in the retail forex world the villains sip margaritas on the Turks and Caicos Islands or are busy forging $35 million ABN-Amro bonds in Switzerland.

But maybe there is finally hope here in Gotham. Perhaps the Dark Regulator can save us from the scammers and con-men who are a blight on our wonderful forex world. Lets hope the CFTCs new task force scheme works out and that they are able to drive these agents of chaos out of the retail forex market once and for all. But then again the Jokers of the retail forex world have never been intimidated by schemes have they?

Joker: Do I really look like a guy with a plan? You know what I am? I'm a dog chasing cars. I wouldn't know what to do with one if I caught it! You know, I just, do things. The mob has plans, the cops have plans, Gordon's got plans. You know, they're schemers. Schemers trying to control their worlds. I'm not a schemer. I try to show the schemers how, pathetic, their attempts to control things really are.

So to the folks at CFTC, please, make sure this latest scheme doesnt draw the kind of ridicule the Joker loves to heap on law enforcement
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #452 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2008, 12:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 211
forexsavior is on a distinguished road
I Trade FX Takes the Stand

Last Friday I Trade FXs response to the NFA regarding the complaint lodged against them was posted on the NFAs website. Below are the details:
BASIC Case Summary

The Nine Lonely Whales
Right off the bat I Trade comes out swinging in their response, denying that they had only 9 accounts with balances of $50,000 or more and insisting they had substantially more such accounts. They did not, however, deny the NFAs statement that they had only 3,000 active customer accounts in total. The number of large accounts is of course an important part of this case. If I Trade only had 9 large accounts than surely they would notice any large transactions taking place amongst any of them. The NFAs entire case rests upon the charge that I Trade did not take any action to report the suspicious transactions that were happening with the Olint accounts, among others.

The Vetting of David Smith
I Trade FX then sticks in the knife with a great line in response to the NFAs repeated references to David Smith acting as a Principal in the firm. Respondents admit that David Smith was listed as a principle of I-Trade starting on March 27, 2007, but only after the NFA took six months to conduct its due diligence investigation of Smith prior to approving Smith as a principal of I-Trade

Ka-POW! I Trade is basically telling the NFA, hey if this guy was so bad why the hell did you approve him to be a principal in the first place? Gotta admire the moxie of I Trade as that takes some brass cajones to get up in NFAs face like that.

However, I could not find any response from I Trade FX in regards to the NFAs charge that David Smith funded I Trade FX with almost all its operating capital in 2007. So it appears that I Trade is conceding that their company was basically bankrolled by David Smith during his tenure as principal. That in my opinion is the real sin for I Trade FX, that their company was using an alleged con mans money to inflate their net cap numbers throughout 2007.

David Smiths Secret Bank Records
As youll recall in an interview conducted by Jamaican Radio David Smith claimed that he would have given NFA his bank records had he had the time to do so before changing his story and stating he couldnt turn them over for legal reasons. I Trade FX states for the record that they simply did not have the legal authority to compel David Smith to provide NFA with the documents when they asked about them. So the question for David Smith remains why would you not turn over your bank records? What legal authority was preventing you from doing this?

The Guts of the Complaint
The main charge NFA is lodging in this complaint is that I Trade FX failed to notify authorities about suspicious activity going on in David Smiths accounts, among others. Here is I Trades response regarding the Olint account activity:

Quote:
Respondents lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 8. Respondents deny that I-Trade failed to file any Suspicious Activity Reports that should have been filed.
Deny, deny, deny. In plain English it seems I Trade FX is telling NFA we arent going to admit these transactions were suspicious and we dont believe we failed to file any Suspicious Activity Reports.

In another clever bit legal jujitsu I Trade FX bats down the charge that they didnt respond to certain Red Flags with this answer:

Quote:
Respondents admit that NFAs 2002 Interpretative Notice identifies the items listed in Paragraph No. 11 above as Red Flags and state in the affirmative that NFAs 2002 Interpretative Notice provides that those red flags may alert employees to suspicious activity that could cause further investigation. (Emphasis added).

Translation: this rule you passed was vague and doesnt require a firm to do jack squat.

That may be the case but doesnt common sense tell you to report this stuff? Ah but common sense has no place in an American courtroom! Gotta love lawyers
The next several pages delve into the specific accounts in question with I Trade admitting some things, denying other things and refusing to comment on the rest. But Im skipping over this because it appears to me most of this legalese is he said, she said type stuff that cant be proven until this case goes to trial. Also, it hurts my head. There is a reason I chose not to go to law school

But this caught my eye at the end:

Quote:
Paragraph No. 28. Despite the highly suspicious activity in the Olint and TCI accounts and the Harris account, as alleged above, at no time did I-Trade file a SAR for any of these accounts contrary to the requirements of NFA Compliance Rule 2-9, the Notice, and I-Trades own AML Program.

ANSWER: Respondents are barred by federal regulations from disclosing to the subject of a SAR that a SAR had been filed against the customer, and because this Answer will be publicly disclosed by the NFA on its website, the Respondents respectfully decline to admit or deny the allegation in Paragraph 28, and are prevented from asserting affirmative statements in their defense, and respectfully suggest that NFAs publication of its Complaint in this matter may have been in violation of the confidentially (sic) provisions of the applicable federal law.
Brilliant! I Trade FX is accusing NFA of possibly violating federal law! Again, Im not a lawyer and I have no way of judging whether or not this is a legitimate line of defense, but once again I Trade is really taking it to NFA and from that perspective it does make for good entertainment. Could this be the reason NFA delayed posting I Trade FXs answer? Well, if it is it appears their legal counsel rubbished this line of defense in the end by brazenly publishing the ANSWER last week.

So now what? Well, I think this case will probably be decided by events on the ground. There are still far too many questions surrounding Olint and David Smith. If the Feds cant prove any financial wrong doing my guess is I Trade FX and NFA will settle the matter a few months from now. But if the Feds find some really nasty stuff on David Smith I cant imagine NFA will give I Trade FX a slap on the wrist.

Lucky for I Trade FX they are not a public company or else their stock would be in the toilet. In the meantime, I am cautioning traders to take a wait and see attitude towards this besieged and embattled firm.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #453 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 10:42 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 211
forexsavior is on a distinguished road
July CFTC Net Capital Report

The CFTC has released its latest Adjusted Net Capital report. With less than two months to go before the NFA raises capital requirements to $10 million the Capital issue is once again front and center in retail forex. How does you firm stack up?
Financial Data for FCMs

The following firms have net capital below $10 million

Bacera $5,448,000
MG Financial $5,545,000
Forex Club $6,709,000
Advanced Markets $6,874,000
Hotspot $7,573,000
Ikon $8,088,000
Friedberg Mercantile $8,176,000
ACM $8,395,000
Easy Forex $9,630,000

No change in capital for Bacera and Money Garden (although Advanced Markets saw a small uptick while Forex Club saw a small downtick.) Also, ACM is still reporting net capital below 10 million. One suspects they had no idea cap requirements were going up and it could very well be they have completely mistimed their entry into the U.S. market. ACM appears to have brought a knife to a gun fight Typical of a Swiss firm isnt it?

The following firms have net capital below $20 million

ODL $10,500,000
GFS Forex $11,296,000
MB Trading $12,201,000
Alpari $12,810,000
IFX $14,941,000
I Trade FX $16,214,000
CMS Forex $17,996,000
FX Solutions $18,887,000

The following firms have net capital above $20 million

PFG $21,695,000
Interbank FX $33,341,000
Gain Capital $67,077,000
GFT Forex $69,497,000
FXCM $78,503,000
Oanda $164,523,000

As always conduct your due diligence and make sure the firm you are trading with will be able to comply with the new law going into effect in less than two months.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #454 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2008, 12:55 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
frinkd is on a distinguished road
Interesting. How can you find the financial date on a particular firm?

Last edited by frinkd; 09-12-2008 at 12:58 AM. Reason: Change of thought
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #455 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2008, 05:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 211
forexsavior is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkd View Post
Interesting. How can you find the financial date on a particular firm?
just click on the link above
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #456 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2008, 05:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 211
forexsavior is on a distinguished road
Saxo Hits the Wall

Saxo Hits the Wall

Lot of news in retail forex the past few weeks. In the U.S. both CMC and Bacera are closing their doors. And in Europe mega forex broker Saxo Bank has run into some serious trouble.

Saxo is one of the largest firms in the currency trading world. Over the summer they spent millions of dollars sponsoring the eventual winner of the Tour De France. It now appears in hindsight that this money was woefully squandered. News reports out of Denmark are saying that Saxo has had to make hundreds of employees redundant amidst the global financial meltdown. Saxo has not come forward with details but it appears the situation is quite serious: Saxo Bank foran stor fyringsrunde

To make matters worse they have had to suspend a senior manager who was the prior head of Swiss broker Synthesis Bank.

The Copenhagen Post

Quote:
Saxo suspend boss | Denmark's fastest growing bank and sponsor of Bjarne Riis' cycling team, on Thursday suspended one of its top executives Charles-Henri Sabet, head of global trading and member of senior executive management. The bank would not say specify the reason for the suspension, but it is currently launching an internal investigation in connection with the Swiss financial authorities, reports DR. Last year the financial institution bought the Swiss Synthesis Bank, founded and owned by Sabet, as part of its global expansion for online investments. (kr)
Oh boy, yet another Swiss broker finds itself under government scrutiny. How many times must I tell the trading public (and retail brokers themselves) do not conduct any business with Swiss forex brokers!

This news following on top of the news that CMC closed its U.S. office and itself has had to make employees redundant around the world would seem to indicate that firms that are involved in the CFD business are really catching a lot of fallout from the financial panic of 08. Developing
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #457 (permalink)  
Old 10-02-2008, 09:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 211
forexsavior is on a distinguished road
Bacera Moves Off-Shore

Last week Bacera officially closed their U.S. office and are no longer servicing U.S. customers. It was always a long shot that they would be able to meet the increased capital requirement to $20 million so this closure comes as no surprise.

But they still plan on doing business outside the NFAs purview and are accepting customers from outside the United States. Bacera has several offices in China and most of their customers are Chinese. Will this become a trend with firms that cant meet the upcoming adjusted net capital increase?

Here are the remaining firms that are still reporting Adjusted Net Capital below $10 million. If these firms are unable to increase their adjusted net capital to $10 million by the end of the month they too will have to close up shop in the U.S. Most of them should be able to do so as some, like HotSpot, have huge parent companies with ample financial reserves. But others like MG and Forex Club are in a very tough position.

Financial Data for FCMs

MG Financial $5,545,000
Forex Club $6,709,000
Advanced Markets $6,874,000
Hotspot $7,573,000
Ikon $8,088,000
Friedberg Mercantile $8,176,000
ACM $8,395,000
Easy Forex $9,630,000
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #458 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 01:10 AM
JoZo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Croatia
Posts: 423
JoZo is on a distinguished road
What about Ikon Royal?
Do you have more info?

Thanks
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #459 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 01:44 AM
ElectricSavant's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,004
ElectricSavant is on a distinguished road
Ikon $8,088,000


Quote:
Originally Posted by JoZo View Post
What about Ikon Royal?
Do you have more info?

Thanks
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #460 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 04:55 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 249
jbfx is on a distinguished road
Thanks forexsavior for your up-to-date information. I really appreciate it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
forex, Jared Martinez fraud

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.forex-tsd.com/general-discussion/8320-proposed-nfa-capital-requirement.html
Posted By For Type Date
I'm done with FXDD - Page 7 This thread Refback 06-30-2008 07:45 PM
Pemegang Acc North Finance - Elliott Wave Forums This thread Refback 04-17-2008 03:52 AM
פורום פורקס (FOREX)טור דו FX לסיסטמים, אי דיקטורים ומסחר מט This thread Refback 03-09-2008 03:28 PM
Forexitalia - Re:Problemi FastBroker e FXLQ - This thread Refback 01-03-2008 08:05 PM
פורום פורקס (FOREX)טורנדו FX לסיסטמים, אינדיקטורים ומסחר מט This thread Refback 12-16-2007 07:00 PM
Forex Liquidity This thread Refback 12-15-2007 04:31 PM
פורום - STRATEGY BANK This thread Refback 12-15-2007 04:24 PM
Easy Forex ->> HOT NEWS!!! This thread Refback 12-14-2007 12:19 PM
Forexitalia - Re:Problemi FastBroker e FXLQ - This thread Refback 12-12-2007 09:56 PM
Latest posts of: sitibiz This thread Refback 11-24-2007 10:45 AM
OANDA FXMessage: NFA Forex Dealer Dead Pool This thread Refback 11-22-2007 06:35 PM
Easy Forex ->> HOT NEWS!!! This thread Refback 11-21-2007 11:08 PM
Easy Forex ->> HOT NEWS!!! This thread Refback 11-21-2007 10:42 PM
Possible bugs - build 210 - Forex Trading Software Forum This thread Refback 10-04-2007 07:43 PM
Forex TSD| Metatrader Indicators and Experts Advisors This thread Refback 09-22-2007 03:42 PM
St Louis Mortgage Refinance - refinance st qualification, colorado mortgage louis This thread Refback 09-07-2007 12:32 AM
Web Link This thread Refback 09-06-2007 03:43 AM
Are Your Funds Safe? NFA to Shut down small forex fcms - Page 10 - Forex Forum This thread Refback 08-31-2007 07:14 PM
Proposed NFA Capital Requirement - Page 23 This thread Refback 08-29-2007 10:19 PM
OANDA FXMessage: NFA Forex Dealer Dead Pool This thread Refback 08-29-2007 04:41 AM
Proposed NFA Capital Requirement - Page 23 This thread Refback 08-29-2007 01:55 AM
Proposed NFA Capital Requirement - Page 23 This thread Refback 08-28-2007 02:05 PM
NFA Forex Dealer Dead Pool - Page 7 - Forex Trading | MetaTrader Indicators and Expert Advisors This thread Pingback 08-28-2007 12:39 PM
OANDA FXMessage: NFA Forex Dealer Dead Pool This thread Refback 08-27-2007 01:57 PM
NFA Forex Dealer Dead Pool - Page 6 - Forex Trading | MetaTrader Indicators and Expert Advisors This thread Pingback 08-24-2007 04:21 PM
Are Your Funds Safe? NFA to Shut down small forex fcms - Page 9 - Forex Forum This thread Refback 08-24-2007 03:19 PM
Lowyat.NET -> Forex Trading Corner This thread Refback 08-05-2007 05:56 AM
Cable Update (GBPUSD) - Page 1465 This thread Refback 07-31-2007 06:11 PM
FOREX EN ESPAOL :: Foro de Pregunta de Forex?? This thread Refback 07-30-2007 02:14 PM