Firebird v63G - Page 11

Wackena · #**101** (**permalink**) 06-09-2006, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarvinSk

Wackena can u post ur statements if possible

attached is statement. First 2 trades were closed manually because these trades were from different settings.

Wackena

Hendrick · #**102** (**permalink**) 06-09-2006, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wackena

TimeFrame in EA Programme is 15 and chart is on M!.

Wackena

Is there any reason why you set the TF=15 in the EA and attach the EA to a M1 chart? Just curious.

Wackena · #**103** (**permalink**) 06-09-2006, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hendrick

Is there any reason why you set the TF=15 in the EA and attach the EA to a M1 chart? Just curious.

No logic. It is just the way I set it up. A novice's shot in the dark, so to speak.

Wackena

cloudy85 · #**104** (**permalink**) 06-10-2006, 02:28 AM

hi everyone & thank you 4 this system

but im too tired to read this topic

so what happening to this system???!

& finally what is the true setting for Firebird v63G ???

thank you!!!!
about

------------------>>>>just kidding

i love u guys
bye

babarmughal · #**105** (**permalink**) 06-12-2006, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wackena

TimeFrame in EA Programme is 15 and chart is on M!.

Wackena

Hi weckena,

you mean to say that you are drag EA on M1 abut in setting MA_timeframe =15 ????

Thanks
Babar

Wackena · #**106** (**permalink**) 06-12-2006, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babarmughal

Hi weckena,

you mean to say that you are drag EA on M1 abut in setting MA_timeframe =15 ????

Thanks
Babar

Babar,

That's correct.

Wackena

npj6400 · #**107** (**permalink**) 06-13-2006, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wackena

No logic. It is just the way I set it up. A novice's shot in the dark, so to speak.

Wackena

Hi,

This is one scary EA

, cannot imagine using it, but happy to assist people in testing whatever on this forum- a bit of fun
Used your settings on Neuimex demo, on 4 majors plus US/CAD, no EUR/USD trades eventuated however settings were all the same.

DO$LAR · #**108** (**permalink**) 06-13-2006, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by npj6400

Hi,

This is one scary EA

, cannot imagine using it, but happy to assist people in testing whatever on this forum- a bit of fun
Used your settings on Neuimex demo, on 4 majors plus US/CAD, no EUR/USD trades eventuated however settings were all the same.

Hi npj6400

what settings this expert and timeframe ?

thank you

Wackena · #**109** (**permalink**) 06-13-2006, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by npj6400

Hi,

This is one scary EA

, cannot imagine using it, but happy to assist people in testing whatever on this forum- a bit of fun
Used your settings on Neuimex demo, on 4 majors plus US/CAD, no EUR/USD trades eventuated however settings were all the same.

Your right. On trading news, it seems to be a 50/50 to make or lose money. Since Sunday, June 11, on a live account it has 16 winning trades, no losers, on 4 pairs eur/usd, gbp/usd, usd/chf & usd/jpy. I have set PipStep to 40. With this setting, open trades range 3 to 6 on average. Most trades closed within 2-3 hours. A few went over 24 hours.

32 hours of trading, with good results, does not make a great EA. But, so far, so good.

Settings
MA_length=10
MA_timeframe=15
MAtype=0
Percent=0.05000000
TradeOnFriday=1
slip=100
Lots=0.01000000
TakeProfit=20
Stoploss=120
Fast_Period=23
Fast_Price=1
Slow_Period=84
Slow_Price=1
DivergenceLimit=0.00200000
Use_V63D_Divergence=0
PipStep=40
IncreasementType=0.00000000
DVLimit=10
PipsGoal=500
PipsLoss=500
GMT=0
DST=0
OpeningHour=0
ClosingHour=24
writelog=0

Wackena

Wackena · #**110** (**permalink**) 06-13-2006, 11:47 AM

I have backtested running this EA with TF=15 and running M1 and then M15 chart setting. It definitely seems to make a difference which chart setting you use. M1 performs much better than M15. Even though TF=15 is in the programme, at least in backtesting, M? selection makes a difference. I will be forward testing this also, just to determine if this is only a backtesting phenomenon.

Wackena