Thanks man, we all are doing our best to make this EA better.

epmfx

Good stuff viptel,

I think we should Forward test Blessing Standard, Blessing StochMOD3 and Blessing StochMOD4 and let the data show which one gives us safer and profitable performance.

If some of us can Backtest with micro lots it would serve as a comparison tool between the EAs for a long period.

Maybe the Backtesters could help us test at least Iron's 4 pairs in the same period with the same settings and that would give us a good idea when we superimpose the charts one on top of each other to see if and when they got to the EP.

Rgds,

epmfx

do you use this set on all pairs ?

we still can hit ep with stoch version

if you run a quick backtest on this setting you'll see that dd is same as with original settings and profit is divided a lot

Here is what I did. A couple weeks ago I set up three demos and started them at the same time.

1. EURUSD H4 Blessing 2 with Iron's SET file.
2. EURUSD H1 Blessing 2 with Stoch. Default settings with Stoch settings at 200-20-20
3. EURUSD H1 Blessing 2 with Stoch. Default settings with Stoch settings at 50-5-5

Currently, Max Draw Down is highest on the original Blessing 2 with Iron's SET file. The other two have lower Max Draw Down.

I will let you all be the judge to which settings gives more profit with the least draw down.

Attached Files

Blessing Statements.zip (10.2 KB, 128 views)

__________________
Don't Let The Love of Money Send you to Hell™

the "problem" is belssing is a martingale

in my opinion is blessing kill account (or portion EP) for sure

the point is blessing open a first position when think to know the trend by MA (maybe can help whit 2nd ma or stoch or rsi or all we want)

then work in a grid step by step and add levels , and lot(n)=lot(n-1)xmult
,so if is a long and strong trend (and one time we take for sure) account for sure take EP

in my opinion to change from blessing to a superblessing we have to solve 2 points

1) first order have to be very accurate but is impossibile know the future , anyway filter whit stoch 2nd ma and other thing is good , we have see blessing stoch and blessing stoch mod4 is more safe (but less profit)

2) i want add this pice of code
when blessing reach x level (maybe 4/5) don't trade , just wait until market change to us direction (whit confirmation of 2nd ma) then open other levels

i think whit this 2 points will be "safe"

Thanks man, this is really great, i can see that Blessing with Stoch H1 50-5-5 had more Profit, and DD was more than Stoch 200-20-20 but still was low.

I think Stoch with 50-20-20 was the best...

epmfx

HolyGuy7,
Thanks for your work comparing these three options. Could you post your settings files for these three tests? From reading through both Blessings threads I'm still not clear on which set file is the classic "Iron's set file". I've posted two settings files that I either downloaded from his posts, or gleaned from test reports that stated they used his settings. One difference I notice between the two I attach below, are the different LAF settings.

If someone could review these, or post the classic "Iron set file" as used for the Blessing 2 v5.2 with StochMOD3 expert, it will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks.

Attached Files

	Settings_Blessing2_v5.2_wStochasticMOD3.txt (1.4 KB, 126 views)
	4majors-4h.set (1.5 KB, 71 views)

2nd point is a good idea
We already thought with bobsters to add a hedge system from 5th level but hard to determine how and when