Blessing 2 v5.2 with Stochastic Indicator - Page 12

feline207 · #**111** (**permalink**) 07-27-2009, 01:45 PM

"when EMA and Stochastic both Agree then the EA starts the Trade" so what does that mean

viptel · #**112** (**permalink**) 07-27-2009, 01:53 PM

my idea is very simple

i add a Fast MA

start to trade IF

stoch is ok ( > 20 and < 80 )
ma (to open buy or sell) (ma 100 for example)
fast ma for confirmation (ma 25 for example)

if ma and fast ma give opposite signal do nothing

whit my backtest seems more "safe"

thanks

alphonso555 · #**113** (**permalink**) 07-27-2009, 04:23 PM

jepm i think teknoesen is right about what he said regarding autocal
the 1440 is for the usdjpy to be used on D1 that is if u divide the 1440 by 24 (hours daily) you will have 60.
so i think that as long as we are working on h1 teknoesen is right it should be 60 minutes.
anyone's input is highly appreciated also.
thanks

alex84 · #**114** (**permalink**) 07-27-2009, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphonso555

jepm i think teknoesen is right about what he said regarding autocal
the 1440 is for the usdjpy to be used on D1 that is if u divide the 1440 by 24 (hours daily) you will have 60.
so i think that as long as we are working on h1 teknoesen is right it should be 60 minutes.
anyone's input is highly appreciated also.
thanks

WRONG
should better keep 1440
its nothing to do with tf you chose to run the ea on
it's used to determine the ATR
run some backtests and you'll see how it affects results and dd

jepm · #**115** (**permalink**) 07-27-2009, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphonso555

jepm i think teknoesen is right about what he said regarding autocal
the 1440 is for the usdjpy to be used on D1 that is if u divide the 1440 by 24 (hours daily) you will have 60.
so i think that as long as we are working on h1 teknoesen is right it should be 60 minutes.
anyone's input is highly appreciated also.
thanks

I agree with Alex, the 1440 has to do with the ATR calculation and it is expressed in seconds, that is 24 minutes.

Cheers,

epmfx

kgm · #**116** (**permalink**) 07-27-2009, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jepm

I agree with Alex, the 1440 has to do with the ATR calculation and it is expressed in seconds, that is 24 minutes.

Cheers,

epmfx

hello All,
Is anyone actually using the EA on a live account. what is the out come like.

pudseybear · #**117** (**permalink**) 07-27-2009, 11:49 PM

I'm all for finding safer way to trade with Blessing, but I do wonder whether this path to safety might lead to a point where the EA is so safe that it doesn't trade anymore

Quote:

Originally Posted by viptel

my idea is very simple

i add a Fast MA

start to trade IF

stoch is ok ( > 20 and < 80 )
ma (to open buy or sell) (ma 100 for example)
fast ma for confirmation (ma 25 for example)

if ma and fast ma give opposite signal do nothing

whit my backtest seems more "safe"

thanks

viptel · #**118** (**permalink**) 07-28-2009, 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pudseybear

I'm all for finding safer way to trade with Blessing, but I do wonder whether this path to safety might lead to a point where the EA is so safe that it doesn't trade anymore

try mod3 and mod4

usd/cad last 2 months

and see what i mean

holyguy7 · #**119** (**permalink**) 07-28-2009, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by viptel

try mod3 and mod4

usd/cad last 2 months

and see what i mean

I agree that safer is better. Can you give us some comparison backtests of both versions so we can compare Max Draw Down and Profits?

Thanks

mynes · #**120** (**permalink**) 07-28-2009, 09:01 AM

I've runs backtest for MOD3 & MOD4 and here are the result.

Pair : EURUSD
TF : H1
Duration : January till today.
setting : MM = false (the rest all default)

not quite understand what happened in the end. it seems for MOD3, the balance suddenly drop in May, and for MOD4, the balance suddenly drop in June.

can anybody explain?