|
|
|
|||||||
| Register in Forex TSD! | |
|
Trading Systems Leaders in this forum (automated trading systems) are winning more than 3000 pips in a month (30000$ investing one lot every time). Click here to register and get more information |
|
 |
|
|
LinkBack (20) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-01-2008, 06:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
originally posted by Wolf You want to place an buy order of 0.1 lot size at EVERY pip? yes wolfe that`s what exactly i mean . forget the other statments. v.v = vice versa     
|
|
03-01-2008, 06:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well if I can figure out what you say...I can agree that that is the best indicator...instead of the lagging ones available out there !
 I think that you are saying as long as we can get 1 pip intervals in successive order we add 0.1...no? then if we do not get our WFM, we wait for the reverse and start the 1 pip in the other direction... but doesn't the lastentryfilter do this in a way?...but not the one pip averaging... ES Quote:
Last edited by ElectricSavant : 03-01-2008 at 06:55 PM.
|
|
03-01-2008, 06:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
yes es that is right
|
|
03-01-2008, 06:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
kayvan...this is brilliance I believe...
Now I gotta' think a little... wolfe would have to leave the last entry filter intact...but somehow organize the max entries to not exceed the doubling progression or the custom progression specified one pip at a time with 0.1 at a time... Folks the kayvan method and the lags are intact for those of you that appreciate them... This new addition will only break up the tops and the bottoms in increments...but the kayvan master plan would be followed as it is now. ES Last edited by ElectricSavant : 03-01-2008 at 07:01 PM.
|
|
03-01-2008, 07:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
kayvan,
would you still wait for the current kayvan breach of 2 pips if you had this incremental building up of your position?...or would you start earlier?.. ES
|
|
03-01-2008, 07:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
yes 2 pips breach is necessary .
|
|
03-01-2008, 07:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
kayvan,
could you confirm this post quoted below for wolfe... do I have this right? ....or do we "can" the lastentryfilter and allow the bars to dictate the kayvan entry...or do you want the breach of the last increment to be breached further for a new "maxentry incremental phased-in position"...this is what the lastentryfilter does...if it is true it forces an exceeding breach..we could simply set to false if it not used. ES Quote:
Last edited by ElectricSavant : 03-01-2008 at 07:31 PM.
|
|
03-01-2008, 07:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
HeHe
maxentry incremental phased-in position
|
|
03-01-2008, 07:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok..
this is how I understand your method... You want one pip intervals with 0.1 size..right? you answered yes... Do we start a new EA and throw this one out as this is not the kayvan method any longer.... or.... Do we incorporate the first entry kayvan criteria...now you use a custom progression yourself don't you? or did you change and decide to use doulbling?...please answer as this is a question to you. Perhaps you want to throw the mathematical progression out completley and only use 0.1 entries at the 2 pip kayvan breach...as long as they present themselves in an exceeding order and reverse when the candle indicates and V.V. ES Last edited by ElectricSavant : 03-01-2008 at 07:46 PM.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Martingale Trend EA | criss73 | Expert Advisors - Metatrader 4 | 7 | 11-17-2007 01:57 PM |
| Reversed martingale | mrv | Expert Advisors - Metatrader 4 | 6 | 07-26-2007 12:28 AM |
| Leverage for martingale | frantacech | Expert Advisors - Metatrader 4 | 0 | 05-22-2007 01:17 PM |
| Martingale EAs? | icepeak | Expert Advisors - Metatrader 4 | 5 | 01-18-2007 02:21 AM |
| Martingale EA | newdigital | Expert Advisors - Metatrader 3 | 2 | 05-23-2006 02:42 PM |
Linear Mode
