Just to remind some information:
20PipsExpert_v2.1 is
here. M15 timeframe. Default settings, alpari broker but this EA will work with any broker so just change the time in the settings according to your broker. And please see
this post for backtesting results. Original thread is
here:
EA,
pre-set files for 4 majors and
AUDUSD, backtesting results for
AUDUSD,
USDJPY,
USDCHF,
GBPUSD,
EURUSD.
Please not that some links are from elite section. But EA is free, the settings are free and I did not change this settings.
And it is the results of forward testing (see below). Elite members may see it by statements and by pairs in pips and deposit currency and by open or close trades weekly and so on. But I feel that I need to post some information about this EA here.
Starting deposit size 25,000.
Trading pairs: EURUSD, GBPUSD, USDJPY, USDCHF and AUDUSD.
by 1st of August totally 21,296.
by 1st of September totally 23,588.
by 1st of October totally 23,068.
by 1st of November totally 16,484.
by 1st of December equity 20,658.
by 1st of January equity 18,981.
by 1st of February equity 20,099.
by 3rd of March equity 21,013.
by 1st of April equity 24,426.
by 1st of May equity 22,739.
by 1st of June equity 30,503.
by 7th of June equity 30,587.
As comments I want to say the following. Look at backtesting results in pdf file. You will see that this EA is not profitable during every year. It is fully correlated to my forward testing results. BTW, it is easy and slowly going EA. The other improtant subject: this EA was created by it's own logic. It means that logic of the system was changed.
Just to re-mind: this system was initially created on Tartan's Russian forum (Tartan is famous coder). I traded this system manually and you may see my statements on this thread. So, this EA was created according to the other logic. Still may be profitable but different.
What to do with original logic? Because my manual statements were very very good. I want to say that original system (manual system) is much more profitable but we need to do something with losses. I mean that once per 1 months this system is creating losees (original one; not an EA with results posted). So it may be good iof some coder look at the original indicator which I traded with and at my original statements and ... may be ... we may reduce the losses in the slighly martingaled

way: in the same way as 5th_element EA or V1V2 for example. Just for losses only.