| New signals service! | |
|
|||||||
| Register in Forex TSD! | |
|
Trading Systems Leaders in this forum (automated trading systems) are winning more than 3000 pips in a month (30000$ investing one lot every time). Click here to register and get more information |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
lol...good try but it looks like you have a ways to go... see attached for the summary to best, when you can rack up over 100 consecutive wins or a 94% win ratio over 600+ trades then come back and let us know
anyways who is ripping off anyone? I dont know where you live but here in the US people are allowed conduct business for profit. Forex afterall is a business and business is about making money. Results27.gif |
|
||||
|
Is this true or it is doctored ? That is a very high win ratio 94%
Quote:
Has this guy doctored this results. I need proof . Their is something not right with the system ? |
|
||||
|
Prove it
Quote:
Is this true or Doctored. Show the Proof on a live account . I am willing to pay US$ 200 if you can show the proof on a live account. If it is that profitable on a live account you would have shown the Live account results. Prove your results that is what we are asking? Even with Neural Networks which are highly complex and very profitable that win ratio of 94% is highly Suspect. I am waiting for Proof. |
|
|||
|
paranoid?
Quote:
I did not come here to draw attention to my "products", nor did I start this thread... kjhfdgjfhdghdf you are the one who drew attention to the listing and on the listing at the bottom is the trade by trade transaction history for the above posted results. I am not going to post a link as I am sure it would be misinterpreted as "shameless self promotion" or something similar... I would suggest you conduct your own evaluation to determine whether the results are accurate or not. Every transaction is verifiable. The trades were taken manually, there was no automation involved. the trades were taken on just two pairs over 1m through 1week timeframes. Position sizing was the only descresionay variable. As someone pointed out above, an indicator is nothing more than a tool. Will everyone who uses this indicator be able to achieve the same results?- of course not. Lets be honest here - if you suck at trading there is nothing is the world which will help you except practice and if you understand trading then you can likely make money with just about any chart setup. What I offer is a means of simplifying the analysis and providing a straight forward, analytical framework which encompasses the best in class attributes that any successfull trading system should contain. I dont think I need to list them.... I think the unfortunate underlying issue here is that the sheer multitude of scams, crap and otherwise floating around has created a sort of widespread skepticism (perhaps rightfully so) about these issues. So help me understand does this mean those like myself who enjoy programming and are trying to run a reputable custom programing business should stop or cease seeking compensation for our work? Im sure a case can be made either way and doubt debate is worth the effort. I will consider i live demonstration in the near future. Best Rgds |
|
|||
|
Just to add my 2 cents worth.
I have bought the dynamic range indicator and have been watching it for over a week or so. ITS VERY GOOD. and I'm definitely going to be using it in the near future. I am also speaking to the guy who does my programming to look at an expert based on it. I have not seen any re painting or moving around so the signals that you see on the screen shots are what you get in real time. There is also an updated version soon with better alerts and email etc. I have bought my fair share of garbage systems just like the rest but this one isnt one of them. Like the man says "if you are crap at trading anyway then the DR indi's probably won't help" Different pairs and indicies work better on different time frames so that would be upto the individual to play with and find a good set up - eg. UK ftse100 is good on 1min and 5 min but some others would work better on 15 etc. I have no affiliation to the vendor nor getting anything for adding these comments. I'm just adding my personal view for balance. Andy |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I do appreciate your reply. As you have noted there are thousands of non traders and even some programmers who claim that they have the best tools but most of them are crap or pure scam. Your Indicator seems to be based on the VT Trader Levelstop-Reverse indicator. I do also appreciate your efforts. I just want to make sure that you are legit. I am successful trader and can do a little programming if i am forced and have been trading for the last 8 years. What caught my eye is the High Percentage of wins. We all Agree that tools only help a trader who knows what he doing. What i don't agree with is the fact some programmer's will scam their way by selling totally useless products with false advertising |
|
||||
|
Why don't you give someone an expiring trial version?
What is so bad about doing this?It could work in your favor. If in a few weeks they see hmm ok its not a holy grail, because that doesn't exist, but its a well working indicator then they would buy it. And so would many others. This being the evaluate commercial ideas section, why don't you give someone an expiring ex4 to test? And if it works as you say then you could expect many customers. Why would this not be worth your while? Unless you don't have confidence in your indicator. If you are worried about someone decompiling it the risk is already there they could use the ones you have already sold people. So there is already the risk of decompiling regardless of giving a trial test version for members of the forum to evaluate. So please don't use that as an excuse. Basically people if he had as much confidence in this as he states then he would allow it to be tested.
__________________
Dont worry, bout a thing, cos every little thing, gonna be alright. ![]() The future has not been written. There is not fate, but what we make for ourselves. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|