Hi David,

I haven't played in my testing with the risk&equity target. but all I can say is that I haven't changed any of the code in regards to the risk&equity target so to me the code should work as before. All my changes are in relation to lot sizes - gives you the posibility to use the sequence you want.
But I'll have to check in the code if there are any corelations.... haven't played with it..

Now... I calculated the Profit Points and Total Lots for my sequence in a buy or sell cycle (that's for TP=24 and Pips=18) ... For the moment I'm not trying to maximize the Profit Points, I rather try to keep the lots size low and save my a** :-) That's only in theory, I didn't take into account slippage, etc... Also, if you use different TP, Pips values it makes sense to recalculate the Lots sequence and see what values you get for Profit Points ....
Hope it makes a bit of sense ...

Level - Lot Size - Total Lots - Profit Points
1 - 0.1 - 0.1 - 2.4
2 - 0.1 - 0.2 - 4.0
3 - 0.1 - 0.3 - 1.8
4 - 0.2 - 0.5 - 1.2
5 - 0.4 - 0.9 - 1.8
6 - 0.6 - 1.5 - 0
7 - 1.2 - 2.7 - 1.8
8 - 2.0 - 4.7 - 1.2
9 - 3.5 - 8.2 - 0.6
10 - 6.2 - 14.4 - 1.8

Also, from my backtesting results, using my settings, aprox 98% of the trades occur in the first 6 levels (that's 0.6 max lot size).

I'll publish some backtests with 90% modeling ..... just a sec - i have to dig through them ... :-)