Originally Posted by Pecunia non olet

I wondered if that might be the case. "Slower but safer" is undoubtedly better for the the long haul.



He's got a very good looking statement. I'd be very happy to post a statement like that.

If he truly has a way to avoid a "MaxTrades6 scenario", that thing is very sweet indeed.

...but it still looks like he should maintain a $2.50 Happy Meal reserve fund, just in case...