01-03-2007, 01:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 105
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aligator
Abrs,
Have a little respect for our fine programmers. You seem to be experimenting with a lot of ideas, and each one can be a separate EA on its own. You have suggested to include several filters, stops, entires, exits, etc. (to be included by "Damn" programmers) that when implemented will make an AE so complicated that all the features will compete with each other rather than making the EA more profitable. Many filters will give you very few signals or non at all, ask any "Damn" programmer. The idea is KISS, keep it simple stupid, and it works for the most successfull systems.
Look, the original version on page 94 post #933 works well and none of the goblygoojagurausorous revisions have made significant improvements to the EA without tweeking the external inputs. I think it will pay off if you learn how to program and implement all these ideas and see for yourself.
aligator
|
Keeping it simple is crucial since we don't want to filter ourselves out of everything that could be traded. I will try some new things soon but need some clear cut direction as to the strategies we would like to try. I can program several into the Jugulator and then allow the user to choose in the parameters what strategy they would like to use.
|