Quote:
|
Originally Posted by davidke20
oh....with this statement, you actually understand what am i trying to point out.back to your 1st statement,if you're winning with the same EA gets the winning position, the other part of the EA user is getting a false signal, they're gonna give the money to pay for your winner's trade. This is called balancing. WE are making the EA to become 50% winning performance now. You're gonna say the EA is god like, but the losser is going to said that its blood sucker. I dont think this arguement is proper to bring up here. I would rather call this a discussion, am I???kekekekke.....i have no offensive here by all mean. glad to share this with you.  |
Sorry i'm not 100% sure what you meant there, but since an EA can trade differently depending on the broker it doesn't mean that the EA will be profitable on one broker and not profitable on another. I have personally seen EA's that are generally profitable be still profitable but in varying degrees dependong on the broker.
One example is the Scalpnet 1.3 EA. It is extremely profitable on the Neuiimex broker but not as much profitable on FXDD or North Finance, this is to do with different broker data. it doesn't mean that one loser on the NF broker pays the Newuimex broker if that's what you meant to say.