than I looked to your code. Obviously your method for finding important peaks is much more advanced than currently in Goertzel.

// find important peaks by measuring each peak's height and sharpness and obtain an "importance" number
// to measure sharpness we consider linear lines between peaks and valleys and measure angles
// the smaller is the angle, the sharpest is the peak. Importance for each peak is given by height/angle

In Goertzel peaks are found and sorted without any additional testing than user defined number of peaks is used to make reverse transform.

So resolution of your MESA should be much better than Goertzel. Than I just wonder if the simple cycle strategy results based on MESA cycles would be better. Unfortunatelly it is not possible to compare it at the moment due to repaint issue.

But it is possible to compare to Ehlers cycles based on the bank filter responses if you want.

Krzysztof