Quote:
hi, why? - 'cause traditional step method is good, simple and proven, like a tank, and still there is a plenty of misunderstanding and confusion, i can imagine what will happen with 'deceiving non-step-like line' ("smooth line" - also pretty deceiving term : ))))
don't know about Hull mtf - i'm piled- up with other things to do - but there are many guys around here
|
'smooth line'.... lol . you're right i just picked that up out of thin air!
But i think it would not differ so much with the original 'step' mtf as it is evident with Stoch LSDs mtf (i studied the code lil' bit, if i'm not mistaken it's just adding draw_section between values...). The programmer who coded it must've anticipated it as he/she is making it an optional one.
I guess the main advantage would be less clutter when multiple period mtf's is stacked.. and I'm imagining the in-between values is not too significant after all...
. Anyway thx for the reply fxbs...!