View Single Post
  #1104 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 12:33 AM
Enforcer Enforcer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 264
Enforcer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by montedoro View Post
Lemyx, I`ll explain again: The order must be placed in the direction of the main trend. So

if( i_Trend(60 min)==UP && ARSI(1 min) == DOWN ) then BUY
AND
if( i_Trend(60 min)==DOWN && ARSI(1 min) == UP ) then SELL

The easy way to make it just for test : change iTrendDecision() each other

if (B1_1 > B1_2 && B2_1 > B2_2) {tradeDirection=-1;} // it was =1
if (S1_1 < S1_2 && S2_1 < S2_2) {tradeDirection= 1;} // it was =-1


I mean we are looking for best position in the H1_trend_channel to place our order. The best result we can expect in pairs usualy in trend and we can play with more risk. The test with GBPUSD was not good example. I`ll test next week with other pairs.

erdenmensch, my changes are not a secret, but I have about 10 raw modified versions of PipMaker just for tests. They will be useless for you. Only I know all the mess I have done with the code inside (actualy my friend did it by my order, I`m not programer and he is already hiding from me because I`m eating all his free time. Untill now the only one sure result I`ve got is with the floating ARSI_trigger. The value of ARSI is rising faster than ATR so this is great way to grab the righ impuls of the price. If Enforcer agree with my tests I expect he to add this in the next versions.
I ran some tests and here my results:

First image: your changes.
Second image: Changed just ARSI trigger, unchanged i-trend.
Third image: my results using ATR as trigger.
I'm looking for lowest DD even profit is not big. But doing this on multiple pairs resulting profit is considerable and risk of DD is split, unlikely all pairs will hit max DD at same time.






Attached Images
File Type: jpg PM15f.jpg (190.6 KB, 625 views)
File Type: jpg PM15g.jpg (184.4 KB, 626 views)
File Type: jpg PM15h.jpg (185.7 KB, 612 views)
Reply With Quote