kayvan,
could you confirm this post quoted below for wolfe...
do I have this right?
....or do we "can" the lastentryfilter and allow the bars to dictate the kayvan entry...or do you want the breach of the last increment to be breached further for a new "maxentry incremental phased-in position"...this is what the lastentryfilter does...if it is true it forces an exceeding breach..we could simply set to false if it not used.
ES
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElectricSavant
kayvan...this is brilliance I believe...
Now I gotta' think a little...
wolfe would have to leave the last entry filter intact...but somehow organize the max entries to not exceed the doubling progression or the custom progression specified one pip at a time with 0.1 at a time...
Folks the kayvan method and the lags are intact for those of you that appreciate them...
This new addition will only break up the tops and the bottoms in increments...but the kayvan master plan would be followed as it is now.
ES
|