View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2005, 07:05 AM
newdigital newdigital is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,227
newdigital has much to be proud ofnewdigital has much to be proud ofnewdigital has much to be proud ofnewdigital has much to be proud ofnewdigital has much to be proud ofnewdigital has much to be proud ofnewdigital has much to be proud ofnewdigital has much to be proud of
Backtesting/Optimization

It was a problem which renoex arised MoStAsHar15
Not asked even. It was just 'rhetorical' questions (question with answer inside the question). Of course no we can not.

But we are working with this tester and do not have any choice.

1. Some people say: do not believe in mt4 strategy tester. To understand about the particular EA you need to test it on demo during the several years (5 or 8 years).

2. The other people (programmers) say that do not believe in demo testing as well. You need to use real money (during the 5 or 8 years) to say: this EA which I (programmer) created are good (or bad).
In this case we have the following: programmers proposed some EAs, testers are spending their own money to prove the programmer's work. And nobody is responsible for anything of course.

3. The other people say that it is not enough even. Because we need to test on real money using the different brokers and different timeframes as well (but nobody said where to get this money from ...).

3. Some people are using mt4 strategy tester to say something about particular EA.

What is your choice?
How the people testing?

Last edited by newdigital : 11-12-2005 at 07:52 AM.
Reply With Quote