I wanted to start by stating the obvious. The main reason for developers to post their systems here is not for people to tell them how much they
. It’s to tap into the resources of the community. I am noticing that once someone comes up with successful settings that the majority leans towards using those settings, and abandoning other tests and/or not posting losing statements and settings. I have seen newdigital and others comment on this topic in other threads. I believe that the majority; all testing the same settings, really doesn’t do a lot to further develop and understand how the EA reacts to the live market. We need to tap into the power of this community and stop wasting resources. Instead of having 110 people all confirm that settings work the same on their demo as they did in another demo, let’s create synergy. Let’s create a method where certain testers contribute by taking on a bundle of settings and posting those results, regardless of how good or bad.
Can anyone think of a way to determine a good range of settings, and then create a list - or something where the tester signs off that he is presently involved on that test (with those specific settings) and will be reporting to the forum?
Let's optimize this thing in a real live environment. Thanks All!